_____________
In this section of
____________
Go to _____________ Books: American Colonial and
Revolutionary War history or the people involved. We have suggestions
for you. _____________
Copyrighted.
© 2005
to
03/24/2011
Leonard H. Bucklin.
-----
The
content of this site may not be reproduced except for brief excerpts for
reviews or scholarly references..
_____________
This is a history education and
research web site of the References in brackets [ ] or in curly brackets { } on any page in this website are to books, or other materials, listed in the Joseph Bucklin Society Gaspee Bibliography, or to materials held by the Joseph Bucklin Society.
|
One thousand English pounds was the price the English crown would pay for information leading to the arrest of the man who shot the English ship captain. How much was a thousand pounds worth? According to EH.Net, the difference in earnings between 1772 and 2000, in England, is about 1000. [EH.Net operates the Economic History Services web site to provide resources for scholars in economic history. EH.Net is supported by the Economic History Association and other affiliated organizations: the Business History Conference, the Cliometric Society, the Economic History Society, and the History of Economics Society.] So, in terms of earning power of a person, a person in 1772 who received 1000 English Pounds would be roughly like a person in the year 2000 getting 100,000 English Pounds (roughly a quarter million American dollars). The statistics of Lawrence H. Officer and Samuel H. Williamson, in "Computing 'Real Value' Over Time With a Conversion Between U.K. Pounds and U.S. Dollars, 1830 - 2005," MeasuringWorth.Com, August 2006, give somewhat the same conversion factor, as their statistics indicate about a 1000 multiplier in the value of money between 1830 and 2000. See also, for a somewhat different estimate, but still of the same general nature, Lawrence H. Officer, "Purchasing Power of British Pounds from 1264 to 2006." MeasuringWorth.com, 2007.] Another reference point in thinking of the real value of the 1000 pounds reward lies in the purchase of the Gaspee, by the English Navy as one of six schooners purchased for the Royal Navy shortly after the end of the French and Indian War in 1763. The ships each cost between 420 to 545. So a person with a thousand pounds could easily purchase a ship and still have plenty left over to operate it (see the cost of labor below), and then still have plenty left over to buy a house and live comfortably in it for a year or more. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thomas Hady, a economist of the sort who deals with statistics of our national economy, has this to say about the value of 1000 pounds during the time of the Revolutionary War (with some editorial alterations by us):
---------------------------------------------------- If we use Hady's noted 1776 figure of 5 shillings as the daily wage for a craftsman, that means that a 1000 pound reward in 1772 was the equivalent of a craftsman being paid every day for 54 years of labor. Because the fact was that the average person only lived to his/her 40's or so, the reward was enough to put any person into a life of relative ease. However, Hady's figures are for the value of money during the Revolution, when money might have had more value than in 1772. There is a statistic regarding the value of money at the start of the Revolution, which might be more directly related to the value in 1772 when King George proclaimed the reward, in Liberty, that great series by the Public Broadcasting Service. It says that: "A typical landless farm laborer might earn £30 a year--- about the same wage as a school teacher." at the start of the Revolution. At this evaluation, the 1000 pounds reward translates into 33 years wages for a school teacher. In short, King George's reward was ample enough to be a fine temptation for an informer to come forth. What made the reward especially tempting is the fact that currency, especially "hard" currency of England, was a scarce commodity in the American colonies. Any person who had cash had a considerable advantage in dealing with others. Cash allowed a person the freedom of escape from the otherwise general need to rely on growing ones own food because of the lack of cash to buy it from others. Cash allowed a person the upper hand in negotiating everything from ale to zealous workmen. Use the links below to go to major areas of this site.
|